This last Sunday morning the horrible news broke out of Oak
Creek, Wisconsin and quickly spread through the media. As Sikhs gathered at the
place of prayer and worship in a local gurdwara outside Milwaukee, a man walked
through the parking lot and shot individuals before moving into the worship facility
and shooting worshipers, including the community’s religious leader. At the end
of the incident seven people were dead, including the suspect, who was killed
by a police officer. Several others were wounded and three people remain in the
hospital in critical condition.
In the initial hours after the shooting, the incident following
just weeks after another mass shooting in a crowded Aurora, Colorado movie-theater,
the media speculated
as to the motives for the shooter. While little is known for certain as the
investigation continues, some media outlets are reporting that the shooter had
connections to white supremacy ideology. If confirmed
it would make this incident a hate crime.
Of course this is not the first case of hate crime directed
at Sikhs. Sikhism has been the unfortunate recipient of religious misidentification and hatred since
9/11. In the days following the September 2001 terrorist attacks, Sikhs,
identified by turbans and beards among males, were assumed to be Muslims by vengeance-minded
and religiously illiterate Americans, and as a result, some were assaulted and killed
in cases of mistaken religious identity. This unacceptable state of affairs
continues to be a major problem for the Sikh community, so much so that some Sikh men have considered violating their
deeply held religious practices by cutting their long hair and removing their
turbans. The incidents of violence have been so numerous that some members of Congress have urged the FBI to begin
collecting data on how the Sikh community has become the special focus of hate
crimes paralleling that directed at Muslims. Understandably, the Sikh community
nationwide now lives in a state of fear.
In addition to the shooting at the Sikh temple in Michigan, this
week saw another incident of religiously inspired violence. This one was
directed at Islam as a mosque was burned to the ground in Joplin,
Missouri, just one month after it had previously been the target of arson.
It has been over a decade since 9/11, and the recent
violence toward Sikhs and Muslims is a clear signal that America still bristles
at its experiment with religious pluralism. Many times, perhaps not so violently, the melting pot is not mixing,
and those who chaff at the presence of certain religions on the American
landscape make their displeasure known through acts of violence.
Even so, there has been positive pushback from those opposed
to hate crimes directed at religious groups. The communities in Wisconsin and
Missouri are rallying around the Sikhs and Muslims as they come to grips with grief,
fear, and how to overcome these challenges. In addition, religious groups are
lending support and speaking out from diverse places. Recently The Hindu
American Foundation issued a statement discussing their outrage at the attacks
and their support with the victims. The earth-based religions making up the pagan community have also been supportive
expressing interfaith condolences through Cherry Hill Seminary and other noted
personalities within the pagan movement.
Although it has not often responded well to the realities of
religiously plural America, Christians must also join this chorus of support
for the Sikh and Muslim victims of hate crimes. Although not a scientific or exhaustive methodology, a recent Google search of mine on "Christian leaders + Sikh temple shooting" revealed precious little by way of public responses by Evangelical leaders, with the curious exception of one comment by Pat Robertson who attributed the violence to atheism, another Evangelical scapegoat. Although they were very visible in the culture wars over same-sex marriage and chicken, in regards to religious hatred and violence, Evangelical leaders and people in the pew seem embarrassingly absent. However, one organization within Evangelicalism, the Evangelical Chapter of the Foundation for Religious
Diplomacy, offers its deepest sympathies to the Sikh community of Oak Creek,
Michigan for their recent losses. It also extends the same to the Muslim
community of Joplin, Missouri as they rebuild their place of worship.
How then might Evangelicals and others respond to this situation beyond the expression of sympathies, seemingly the least that can be offered in response to such tragedies? In this situation Evangelicals must exemplify the best from
their religious tradition in the ethic of love for their neighbor. We must reach out to both the Sikh and
Muslim communities in Michigan, Missouri, and beyond to contribute to a
national climate that fosters understanding and the ability to not only tolerate, but also to embrace the
other in civility despite our religious differences.
America’s Founding Fathers put together a form of government
that enabled its citizens to maintain their religious differences and to
express them in ways that avoided the religion-fueled wars of Europe. But episodes like those in Wisconsin
and Missouri test these important American ideals. Our grand
experiment must continue but something new needs to be added to the mix. Yes, we need to counter religious illiteracy, but that leaves a huge chasm between the religiously informed individual but who remains one who harbors distaste if not hatred for religious others in their community. How then do we incorporate religious literacy programs but do so in ways that also overcome the perception of monstrous religious others? The prescription comes through peaceful
contestation provided for a citizenry committed to a life lived in service to
others through religious diplomacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment